No age requirement at wordpress.com – There is no age requirement in effect for becoming a blogger at wordpress.com and we do have children under the age of 13 years blogging here. What follows is an example. I hasten to add, it’s not isolated to a single child, as Google searches reveal that other children blogging at wordpress.com have published their ages online.
WordPress.com Support Forum Example
Aussielover, Member: “I’ve invited several friends,and they all say they can’t view it because it says it’s private. Anyone know why?”
Timethief, Member: “Yes! You have set up your blog to be private and “protected”. Exactly what were you aiming for please? We can’t help unless you give more information.“
Aussielover, Member: “I’m [age deleted - drmike] so i wanted it to be private,not public,and i invited family and friends to view it.but they can’t.i mean me and my mom used the thing you can fill out to invite them…….”
Timethief, Member: “I could be wrong but I believe the law requires that you have to be 13 years of age or older to have your own blog here.”
Mark, Key Master: “We have no such requirement.”
Age Requirements in Cyberspace: What the Law Mandates – The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) regulates the use of websites by minors. Websites targeted primarily at children have a duty to obtain “verifiable” parental consent before allowing children thirteen years and under to become users. The Federal Trade (FTC) commission is the agency that enforces COPPA.
The FTC, after noting that “children under thirteen have often been the standard for distinguishing adolescents from young children who may need special protections,” adds that “As a general matter, however, the FTC encourages operators to afford teens privacy protections, given the risks inherent in the disclosure of personal information for all ages.”
History – Congress passed the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (“COPPA”). COPPA is aimed at websites that offer services directly to children under age 13, but it is also aimed at websites making their services available to children under age 13, despite not being the primary users. COPPA requires such websites to:
* Post a privacy policy with links to the notice provided on the home page and at each area where the site or online service collects personal information from children;
* Detail how the operator of the website uses the personal information and whether it is disclosed to third parties;
* Describe every kind of information collected from children, such as, name, address, e-mail address, hobbies, and age;
* Institute procedures that “protect the confidentiality, security, and integrity of personal information collected from children.”
* Provide parents with contact information for all operators collecting or maintaining children’s personal information;
* Allow parents to review, correct, and delete information about their children collected by such services; and
* Obtain parental consent before collecting, using, or disclosing personal information about a child under the age of 13. For full text see this link.
Court Actions – Recently, the FTC commenced an enforcement action against Xanga.com, another popular social networking site, alleging that the site had failed to implement proper age controls. Xanga.com agreed to pay $1 million — the largest penalty ever assessed for violations of COPPA.
According to the FTC’s complaint, Xanga permitted approximately 1.7 million accounts to be opened by individuals who listed birth dates indicating that they were under age thirteen, without getting parental consent. Collecting personal information from anyone under thirteen without parental consent is a violation of COPPA.
In addition four other have families filed suit against the social-networking site MySpace and its owner, News Corporation. Each family alleges that its teenage daughter was sexually abused by an adult she met on MySpace. This was not the first such suit for MySpace. In June 2006, MySpace was sued by a Texas family who alleges that its fourteen-year-old daughter was assaulted by a nineteen-year-old she met on MySpace – who lied about being a senior in high school to gain her trust. These cases have yet to be decided by the courts.
The AG’s Proposals – A group of thirty-three states’ Attorneys General, led by Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal, has threatened possible legal action if MySpace does not raise the minimum age of its members from its current fourteen, to sixteen, and also confirm the ages of all of its users.
First, there’s the proposed age limit: The Attorneys General have focused on the age of sixteen and there are arguments both in favour and opposed to setting that limit. Second, there’s verification of member’s ages against public databases. There are arguments both in favour and opposed to this proposal as well, although it seems to be the more promising one of the two.
Wrap-up – It seems the underlying reasons these issues have arisen are four-fold:
(1) The freewheeling uncensored and accessible nature of internet technology.
(2) The fact that many parents are exercising no supervision over their children’s use of the internet.
(3) The fact that both children and adults impersonating children, including sexual predators, are not using the internet responsibly.
(4) The fact that despite COPPA’s protections, there is a thriving list brokerage industry that targets children.
At this link you can see an image is of a pre-school list advertisement, where marketers can purchase one million names for only $5. For more information on list brokerage and profiling, see the EPIC Profiling Page and the EPIC Student Privacy Page.
that picture is hilarious
i’m not sure that a simple yes or no checkbox in the signup really provides that much protection, though.
the answer to these things is almost always better parenting, rather than better technology.
Eh, I thought the picture was really cute.
Granted it doesn’t typify the kids we meet online everyday. They can swear, flame and hurl insults equal to the worst adult trolls but they can’t spell and have no knowledge of grammar or decorum. However, their blog get lots of hits and we do see Club Penguin blogs in the “top” listings.
That being said, I do agree with the point you have made about parenting or, shall I say – the lack thereof? It seems many people are still fixated on producing little images of themselves. This is despite the fact many don’t display any inclination of being possessed of the skills or the desire to actually parent them. It’s also despite the fact that the world population explosion and the current state of the planet would indicate another course of action would be the wiser one to take.
I tried to produce a fairly balanced and informed article, although I did allow my bias to be seen with respect to preferring the second AG’s proposal to the first one. Hopefully, readers will click through the links and consider the arguments both for and against the AG’s proposals and come to their own conclusions.
Thanks for dropping by and please come again soon.
I think it would be difficult to confirm the age of the members. Usually when they attempt to confirm the age of a member the site asks for the person to enter their birth date (mm/dd/yy); but if a kid really wants to join the site they’ll just lie and enter an adults birthday to qualify.
So it really is up to the parents to check what their children are doing online. And now that some browsers allow parental control, it wouldn’t be too hard for parents to protect their children. My browser has an account choice of either limited or administrative. Admin would be an adult account where the user could visit any site, but Limited is a child account where the user could only visit certain sites that weren’t marked as blocked for that account.
It sounds like internet lock down or something but sometimes the extreme measures are the only way to protect children. I certainly was mad when my mom had me on the limited account, but now that I’m older I realize she was protecting me.
Sorry for the long comment TT, btw I love your new theme and avatar!
On first reading I thought the second option might be worth pursuing.
But now I believe it’s too onerous.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment and for the compliments too. I’ve finally found a theme that fits my content better that k2 lite did. And as for the avatar make no mistake about it I’m a sun person. I’m in my element when the weather is hot and dry.
your welcome….we’re opposites…I like cold rainy days….only when in bed under the covers looking out the window at the rain falling down of course.
I wonder how it is that what seems so simple to me – who’s not a parent – can be so hard for supposed parents to understand? They are supposed to be responsible for their children, watching what they do and what they use… if that includes them limiting internet access then that’s what they should do. And I know it can be done because a parent I know does it very well with her kids. She will not even allow her 14 year old to use messenger, let alone surf alone.
It’s so laughable, yet sinister, that parents are now filing suit against social networking sites because they’ve neglected their own responsibility for their kids.
/waving to Jan
@britgirl,
I also have friends with teens and they are supervised when using the internet. Their parents are actually parenting them. Remarkably many parents don’t supervise their kids and I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that these parents who are suing and among the non-parenting set.
This is a real problem. I wrote about it late last year in an entry titled “The Trouble With Web 2.0″ and how authorities are so far behind the technology that the kids are jumping into. Worth a read:
http://paralleldivergence.com/2006/10/28/the-trouble-with-web-20/
Thanks for your comment and the link to your post. I read your post and heartily agreed with your conclusion:
“So what’s needed? I think governments, schools and parents need to be more open-minded about the social-networking phenomenon for a start. We need to stop managing the posts and start managing the people who post. We need to update the age-old difference between right and wrong to mould it into a Web 2.0 environment. It’s not about exclusion, it’s about teaching respect and consideration and responsible self-publishing. It’s about teaching people to think critically in all aspects of life and it all needs to be backed up with appropriate, enforceable guidelines and laws.”
They can say they are any age they like, Unless you have words with their parents or see their birth certificates then you have no proof, Little blighters
)
That’s the problem, for sure.
[...] Related Blog Post: Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act [...]
[...] blog posts: Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Internet Safety Advisor: Keeping Children Safe Online The High Cost of Texting [...]